The Question That Changes Everything
Have you ever fixed a bug only to see it resurface a week later? Or implemented a feature that users never actually needed? The difference between good and great software engineering often comes down to one simple word: Why.
In the fast-paced world of software development, asking “why” repeatedly—typically five times—helps identify the underlying systemic cause instead of just symptoms. This isn’t just about debugging code; it’s about building better systems, fostering innovation, and creating real value for users and businesses.
Toyota's Gift to Software Engineering
The Five Whys technique was developed by Sakichi Toyoda at Toyota in the 1930s and became the standard root cause analysis method across manufacturing, healthcare, software development, and anywhere recurring problems drain productivity.
But here’s the thing: the “five” is a guideline, not a rule—simple problems might need 2-3 whys, while complex ones might need 7-8 or more.
A Real-World Software Example
Problem: The application crashes during heavy user load.
Why #1: Why does the software crash during heavy user load?
→ The server becomes overwhelmed with concurrent requests.
Why #2: Why does the server become overwhelmed?
→ The server’s capacity wasn’t scaled to handle high traffic.
Why #3: Why wasn’t the server scaled properly?
→ The team didn’t perform load testing during development.
Why #4: Why didn’t we do load testing?
→ Load testing wasn’t included in the project scope.
Why #5: Why wasn’t it in scope?→ We lacked the resources and expertise for load testing.
Root Cause
The Fix
Beyond Bug Fixes
Questioning the Status Quo
The Growth Mindset Connection
Practical Applications
Code Reviews
# Instead of accepting this without question:
def process_data(data):
time.sleep(2) # Wait for processing
return transform(data)
# Ask: Why the 2-second sleep?
# Better solution after asking "why":
def process_data(data):
# Poll for completion with exponential backoff
return await_processing_complete(data)
Architecture Decisions
- Why do we need microservices?
- Why not a monolith first?
- Why this particular service boundary?
- Why now, not later when we have more data?
Feature Development
Building a Culture of Curiosity
For Individual Contributors
Pro tip: Frame your questions constructively:
- Don't: "This design is confusing."
- Do: "Why did we choose this approach over X? I want to understand the tradeoffs."
For Leaders and Managers
- Why are we prioritizing this feature?
- Why this tech stack over alternatives?
- Why are we measuring success this way?
For Business Stakeholders
Business: "We need this feature by next week."
Engineer: "Why next week specifically?"
Business: "We have a demo with a major client."
Engineer: "Why do they need this specific feature?"
Business: "They mentioned needing better reporting."
Engineer: "Why not show them our existing analytics with enhanced filters?"
Result: Delivered in 2 days instead of a rushed week of development.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Stopping Too Soon
The Blame Game
Analysis Paralysis
The Detective Mindset
One of the most valuable skills a tester can develop is the ability to think like a detective—driven by curiosity, persistence, and an analytical approach to uncovering software defects that might otherwise go unnoticed.
This applies to all engineers, not just testers. If you want to dive deeper into the detective approach to coding, check out my previous post on Sherlock Holmes Programming: Detective Methods for Coders where I explore how classic detective techniques can transform your debugging and problem-solving skills. Approach every task as an investigation.
ROI of Asking "Why"
For Startups and Entrepreneurs
-
Reduced technical debt:
Fixing root causes prevents compound interest on bad decisions -
Faster iteration:
Understanding "why" helps you pivot intelligently -
Better product-market fit:
Asking "why do users need this?" leads to genuine value
For Established Companies
-
Lower maintenance costs:
Over time, continuous incremental investments and improvements compound, improving productivity and freeing up time previously lost to fire-fighting breakdowns -
Improved team morale:
Engineers feel empowered when their questions matter -
Competitive advantage:
A product mindset puts emphasis on customers and value, rather than proxy metrics and activities, helping enable key DevOps goals
Measurable Impact
- Reduce recurring bugs by up to 70%
- Decrease time-to-resolution by 50%
- Improve code quality scores significantly
Explore project snapshots or discuss custom web solutions.
Getting Started
Week 1: Personal Practice
- Pick one bug or task
- Write down five "why" questions before coding
- Document your findings
Week 2: Team Integration
- Introduce Five Whys in retrospectives
- Practice with one recent production issue
- Create a shared learning document
Week 3: Process Embedding
- Add "Root Cause" field to bug tickets
- Include "Why" discussions in design reviews
- Celebrate good questions in standups
The Compound Interest of Curiosity
- Deepens your understanding
- Prevents future problems
- Builds better systems
- Inspires your team
- Creates lasting value
Start today. Pick one task. Ask why five times. See where it leads you.
By repeating why five times, the nature of the problem as well as its solution becomes clear.
Thank You for Spending Your Valuable Time
I truly appreciate you taking the time to read blog. Your valuable time means a lot to me, and I hope you found the content insightful and engaging!
Frequently Asked Questions
Frame questions with genuine curiosity: "I want to understand the reasoning behind X so I can learn" works better than "Why would we do X?" Use collaborative language like "Can you help me understand why..." or "I'm curious about the decision to..."
If your culture doesn't support honest answers, the Five Whys won't work regardless of how well you understand the technique. Start small—ask "why" in one-on-ones first, demonstrate value through better solutions, and gradually build psychological safety.
The "five" is arbitrary—some problems need two iterations, others need ten. You'll know you've revealed the root cause when asking "why" produces no more useful responses, and you can go no further.
Five Whys is most effective when used to resolve simple or moderately difficult problems—it may not be suitable for complex or critical problems that could have multiple causes. For complex issues, consider Fishbone diagrams, FMEA, or comprehensive root cause analysis.
Short-term, skipping "why" seems faster. Long-term, it's slower because you'll revisit the same issues repeatedly. As a software engineer, it is vital to make conscious decisions at every step—this deliberate approach ensures that every action is purposeful and aligned with your goals. Even spending 15 minutes on "why" can save hours later.
Comments are closed