What is JWT and Why Should You Care?
JSON Web Token (JWT) is an open standard (RFC 7519) that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. Think of JWT as a secure digital passport—it carries your identity information wherever you go online, and any server can verify its authenticity without calling back to the issuer.
In simpler terms, JWT is a token format that allows you to authenticate users and share information securely between different parts of your application. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed using a secret (HMAC algorithm) or a public/private key pair using RSA or ECDSA.
The Anatomy of a JWT
A JWT consists of three parts separated by dots (.), creating a structure like this: xxxxx.yyyyy.zzzzz
// Example JWT structure
eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNzA4MzQ1MTIzfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5
Header
Payload
Signature
Why Use JWT?
For Technical Leaders
-
Reduced Infrastructure Costs
No session storage means fewer database queries and lower server load -
Improved Scalability
Suitable for microservices and distributed systems where horizontal scaling is essential -
Better Performance
Eliminates I/O from database lookups, resulting in faster response times
For Developers
-
Cross-Platform Compatibility
Works seamlessly across web, mobile, and IoT applications -
API-Friendly
Compact and portable—fits in headers, cookies, or query parameters -
Developer Experience
Simple to implement with libraries available in every major programming language
When to Use JWT?
API Authentication
Microservices Communication
Mobile Application Sessions
JWT Security
-
Use Strong Algorithms
Use RS256 or ES256 over weak algorithms -
Secure Storage
Store JWTs in HttpOnly cookies instead of localStorage to prevent XSS attacks -
Short Expiration
Use short exp durations and implement refresh tokens to reduce impact if a token is compromised -
HTTPS Only
Always transmit JWTs over HTTPS to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks -
Minimal Payload
Do not include passwords, PII, or credentials unless using encrypted JWT (JWE)
JWT Alternatives
Session-Based Authentication
- Building traditional web applications
- Need immediate token revocation
- Working with a single server or sticky sessions
OAuth 2.0
- Implementing "Sign in with Google/Facebook/GitHub"
- Need delegating user authorization and accessing third-party applications
- Building platforms where external apps access user resources
PASETO (Platform-Agnostic Security Tokens)
- Maximum security is required
- Want to avoid algorithm confusion attacks
- Building new systems without legacy JWT requirements
Branca Tokens
- Need encrypted tokens by default
- Working with efficiency-critical systems
- Want smaller token sizes
Explore project snapshots or discuss custom web solutions.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | JWT | Session | OAuth 2.0 | PASETO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statefulness | Stateless | Stateful | Stateful | Stateless |
| Scalability | Excellent | Limited | Good | Excellent |
| Security | Good (if configured) | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| Complexity | Low | Low | High | Low |
| Revocation | Difficult | Immediate | Immediate | Difficult |
| Best for | APIs, Microservices | Traditional web apps | Third-party auth | High-security apps |
Common JWT Pitfalls and Solutions
Token Theft
Cannot Revoke Tokens
Token Size Overhead
Making the Right Choice
- Stateless authentication across distributed systems
- Cross-platform compatibility (web, mobile, IoT)
- High-performance API authentication
- Microservices communication
- Immediate token revocation (use sessions)
- Third-party authentication (use OAuth 2.0)
- Maximum security with no configuration errors (use PASETO)
Security is not a product, but a process.
Thank You for Spending Your Valuable Time
I truly appreciate you taking the time to read blog. Your valuable time means a lot to me, and I hope you found the content insightful and engaging!
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, when implemented correctly. JWTs are not secure just because they are JWTs; it's the way in which they're used that determines whether they are secure or not. Follow RFC 8725 best practices, use strong algorithms (RS256/ES256), and always transmit over HTTPS.
Storing JSON web tokens in localStorage makes them susceptible to XSS attacks. The recommended approach is to store JWTs in HttpOnly cookies, as this prevents exposure to client-side JavaScript and is the best approach to maintain security best practices.
Implement a refresh token mechanism. Issue short-lived access tokens (15 minutes) and longer-lived refresh tokens (7 days). When the access token expires, use the refresh token to get a new one without requiring the user to log in again.
Yes, but with considerations. JWTs work well for initial WebSocket authentication, but for real-time updates, consider combining JWT with WebSocket protocols. Authenticate the WebSocket connection using JWT, then maintain the connection without re-validating tokens for every message.
OAuth is used for authorization while JWT is a token format. JWT defines the token format, OAuth defines the authorization protocols. They often work together—OAuth 2.0 can use JWT as the token format for access tokens, combining OAuth's robust authorization framework with JWT's compact, self-contained nature.
Comments are closed